"Hellbound: Hellraiser II" A sequel worthy of the Original


7/9/2019

Read my review of the original “Hellraiser”

Released about a year after the original, Kristy is back as well as Pinhead and the Cenobites, which could also be the name of an awesome 80s metal band.  Nevertheless, like most women who survive a horror movie, Kristy is now confined to a mental hospital.  She is being treated by Dr. Channard and his young assistant Kyle.  As a hobby, Dr. Channard has been obsessed with death and searching for a doorway to hell.  After hearing Kristy’s story he thinks she is key to him finding it.

We get a number of flashbacks to the original, Kristy’s father Larry is now stuck in hell while her evil stepmother Julia is looking to be reborn and take revenge on Kristy after being killed off.  A lot hinges on the bloody mattress that she died on and the infamous puzzle box used to summon the sadomasochistic Cenobites.  Dr. Channard steals this mattress and bare with me, feeds it one of his patients.  This starts the resurrection process as we saw in the first film with Frank.  This time Julia comes back to life as a skinless, bloody mess looking for more victims to make her whole again.

While in the mental hospital Kristy makes friends with a quiet blonde girl named Tiffany who is about her age who has a talent for solving puzzles.  She could definitely come in handy when it comes to the puzzle box.  Kyle tries to help the girls but Julia gets rid of him pretty quick.  Tiffany is then able to open the puzzle box and the doorway to hell.  The girls not only need to fight off the evil Dr. Channard and Julia, but Kristy is hoping to also find her father.  Not to mention Pinhead and the cenobites who just love to dole out equal amounts of pain and pleasure to everyone.

Similar to the first film the practical special effects are amazing, but we do get another dose of cheesy optical and lighting effects which in this case can be forgiven.  I would have liked to have seen more of Pinhead and Cenobites as most of the story revolves around Dr. Channard and Julia.  In that area, I can help but feel a little cheated but overall it’s a decent sequel worthy of the “Hellraiser” name.


"Sinister 2" Another Unasked for Horror Sequel


6/21/2019

Before getting into this review please take a moment to check out my thoughts on the first film “Sinister”

For the sequel, we have a new family and this time a female protagonist in the form of a single mother named Courtney, played by Shannyn Sossamon.  Her and her twin boys, Dylan and Zach, are on the run from her abusive ex-husband and have found a place to lay low for a while.   The only returning character from the first film is Deputy So and So (James Ransone), who is now credited as Ex-Deputy So and So.  They keep up the running joke of never giving us his actual name.  He’s been on the road trying to stop the string of murders caused by the Pagan Deity Buguul.  

“Sinister 2” seems to fall into the horror sequel trap of rehashing what worked in the first film.  The filmmakers resort to investigating strange noises and more creepy 8 mm films that were created by the supernatural kids under Bughuul control.  The whole supernatural dead kids angle is a little strange as only Zach and Dylan can see them.  They choose Dylan and force him to watch the grainy and choppy 8 mm films showing families getting murdered.  Courtney and Ex-Deputy So and So start to develop a sort of relationship when her ex-husband Clint comes roaring with his truck trying to gain custody of the kids.  So and So stands up to him and cop he brought with him and they eventually leave.  It seems like this story really has nothing to do or anything important to say.  While it tries to explain the origins of Bughuul is just not at all scary or all that interesting for that matter.

The ending gets a bit of a twist as Zach is now the one who has been brainwashed into killing the family and how he gets them all tied up on crucifixes like scarecrows I do not know.  Anyway, things fizzle out and we are left with more nonsense.  By the way who develops the 8 mm film? No to many labs out there and for snuff films? Just a few holes in this swiss cheese of a film. 

"Super Dark Times"


5/25/2019

“Super Dark Times” delivers what it promises.  The film is dark and honest look time at the lives of a few teenagers living in suburban America and an event that will change all of their lives forever.  Although this promising film does suffer from a third act breakdown all of the stuff beforehand is well executed.

The story is grounded in a typical suburban American reality, Zach and Josh are best of friends who spend their days at school and riding bikes around their small rural town.  They hang out with a few other kids Charlie and Daryl.  Daryl is a character that everyone can probably remember knowing growing up.  He is the foul-mouthed fat kid, who tries way too hard to be liked.  With not much to do the teens wander around on their bikes usually ending up at someone's house.  The characters and dialogue feel extremely naturalistic and true to life which sets this film apart.  Stereotypes are held to a bare minimum and the characters feel lived in.  While at Josh’s house, they go into his older brothers room, who is currently in the Marines, and find some weed and a samurai sword.  Josh tells them to leave the weed, but they go outside and horse around with the sword.  What could go wrong right?

Daryl’s constant harassment of the others and the fact that he actually stole the weed pisses off Josh and they get into it a little bit.  But when Daryl sucker punches Josh, who is currently holding the sword, an unfortunate accident occurs.  Daryl is stabbed deeply in the throat and everybody freaks out.  This scene is hard to watch and its graphic realism is something that cuts to the core of anyone who sees it.  All three teens panic and cover up the body, they get rid of the sword and make a pact not to tell anyone.  This obviously creates a heavy sense of paranoia, guilt, and anxiety that takes this film to its ultimately unsatisfying ending.  Also at this time, Charlie’s girl crush at school starts to show interest in him.  Charlie is the heart of the film and the character the story primarily follows.  His journey is our journey.  His friendship with Josh quickly spirals into paranoia and fear of each other.  Although it's hard to say what a person would do in this situation you assume one if not both of the kids will crack under the pressure.  What Josh does seems to betray the strong sense of realism that the film has built up.  I’m not saying it couldn’t happen, but it just felt wrong.  This is a film about morality and doing the right thing and when you’re a teenager this can be very tricky.

“Super Dark Times” draws comparisons between 2001s “Bully” and 2004s “Mean Creek” although to me “Super Dark Times” feels more authentic while “Bully” like its title is more mean spirited.  Both films involve a sort of misguided revenge, while “Super Dark Times” revolves around an accident.  While made for under a million dollars “Super Dark Times” looks and feels like movies ten times its budget, as the characters really shine.  This is definitely a film to see despite its wayward ending.

REVIEW - "Mean Creek"
REVIEW - "Bully"

Bill Maher's "Religulous" is a Laugh Riot!


5/16/2019

Comedian Bill Maher is a man who doesn’t shy away from taboo subjects, he once has a TV show called “Politically Incorrect” and currently has a long running talk show on HBO called “Real Time with Bill Maher”.  The 2008 documentary “Religulous” takes a hilarious and unflinching look at religion and all its forms.

Maher had an interesting upbringing himself with his father being roman catholic and his mother Jewish. Obviously, when you start questioning peoples beliefs you’re going to run into some resistance, but Maher approaches this as a person with an open mind and doubt at its core.
Maher’s trademark sarcasm and quick wit have made him both a champion for his far left leaning supporters and a lightning rod of controversy for conservative America.  “Religulous” makes the point that “Religion has been detrimental to human progress”.  

Maher visits with numerous religious leaders and followers primarily in the American Midwest (the Bible belt) and asks simple questions that usually end up in laughs and awkward silences. Religion is quite the business and is very adept at exploiting peoples beliefs to fund lavish lifestyles for clergy members.  Maher travels to Florida to a Christian themed amusement park called “The Holy Land Experience” and interviews Jesus, who is some dude on a summer job. The park re-enacts the crucifixion and of course has a gift shop.  Maher’s presence alerts the staff and security similar to when people see Michale Moore with a camera crew.  In his travels, Maher brings up the very real issue of God and Nationalism.  While America is supposedly a melting pot of cultures, ideas, and freedoms it has always been fully enmeshed in Christianity.  

Maher interviews a number of Muslims who defend their beliefs and characterize their wrongs and denials as “politics”.  When it comes to Scientology and Mormon’s Maher has a field day in pointing out the eccentricities of these newer religions and their truly bizarre origins.  No matter what religion a person is affiliated with, how do these people come to believe the things they do?  Is it indoctrinated at youth like in the documentary “Jesus Camp”?  To take everything on blind faith is quite dangerous and detrimental to society as a whole.  All too often beliefs are forced upon people and this also very troublesome.  Religion and politics always get mixed up together and are usually dealt with in a serious and contentious manner.  That’s why it's such a breath of fresh air when a guy like Bill Maher can bring some humor and levity to such subjects.  Sure he can be a pretentious smart ass but he is not afraid to ask uncomfortable questions.  It looks like he could’ve made a good lawyer since he is so good at making other people look like idiots.

I found “Religulous” to be a laugh riot and Maher to be a lot more palatable than Michael Moore.  Larry Charles, who directed “Borat” a few years earlier, directed this film as well.  Although Maher is not Borat, he still gets the same amount of laughs.

The Controversial and Thought Provoking "Jesus Camp"


5/8/2019

It’s been true since the dawn of time if you want to stir up intense debate and controversy just bring up religion or politics.  The 2006 Oscar nominated documentary “Jesus Camp” is full of both.  Directors Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady focus their attention on the far right Evangelical Christians of middle America.  No matter what your personal beliefs are this film stirs up passionate responses on both sides.

We meet Becky Fisher a Pentecostal children’s preacher who holds these camps that indoctrinate children into a way of thinking.  They are told they are soldiers in a war to reclaim America for Christ.  Becky and the other adults in the greater scheme of things are using children as pawns to actively recruit others.  This whole practice sounds similar to how Nazi Germany used the Hitler Youth to push their agenda.  It’s a sickening practice that desperate and fearful extremist use to serve their own twisted ego’s.  Kids of course just want the love and attention of their parents and will do anything to get it so they just go along with it not really knowing what they are doing or what it all means.

The families involved in these camps look to be lower middle class families and this is punctuated by a young boy that the filmmakers choose to follow.  Levi is a 12 year old boy and a stereotypical trailer park kid with baggy clothes and a long rat tail running down his back.  He has bought into all of these teachings and preaches himself.  While most of the kids interviewed seem either extremely nervous or extensively coached, Levi has confidence and belief in what he says.

The filmmakers also make it abundantly clear the beliefs of the Evangelicals.  The theory of evolution is heresy and global warming is a political myth.  That Harry Potter is the anti-christ meant to lure kids to Satan (seriously, I’m not joking here).  It is mentioned that 75% of homeschooled children are evangelical, which points to a deep mistrust in society at large.  The filmmakers then follow Levi and some other kids as they visit Colorado Springs and the church of famed minister Ted Haggard.  Hagged also happened to be the President of the National Association of Evangelicals.  The camera follows him on stage as he makes a number of off-color remarks about gays.  But wouldn’t you know a little after this film was released Haggard found himself embroiled in a scandal with his own gay lover/drug dealer.  The Hypocrisy just doesn’t get any better than this.  Religion is just a business like any other with usually the poorest of people giving money to the rich for “salvation”.  

In conclusion, the way a person chooses to live their life is totally up to them, but when it comes to extremists and using children to fight your battles is cause for concern no matter what you believe.  The question of whether these Jesus Camps actually do harm to these kids is up for debate like everything else.  Is it child abuse?  Where Becky Fisher’s methods a little too intense?  Religion is one of those topics that raise existential questions like Mankind’s attempt to rationalize its own existence an will continue until we as a people finally destroy ourselves or as Evangelicals believe the return of Jesus Christ. I won’t be holding my breath.


"The Miseducation of Cameron Post"


5/7/2019

Winner of the 2018 Grand Jury prize at the Sundance film festival “The Miseducation of Cameron Post” is a powerful and heartbreaking drama that is based on an all too real tragedy that is being put upon many young people still to this day.  The concept of the gay conversion camp where parents send their kids to “become straight” is ridiculous, barbaric and just plain wrong on every conceivable level. 

Taking place in 1993, Chloe Grace Moretz plays Cameron Post a teen girl who has found love with another girl named Coley.  Their relationship is kept quiet until they are found making out in the back seat of their car at the prom.  Cameron’s Christian parents send her to a place called “God’s Promise” a gay conversion camp run by Reverend Rick and Dr. Lydia Marsh.  They really don’t seem to know what they are doing but Lydia is very strict and determined to “heal” these kids at any cost.  Cameron’s meets up with Jane (Sasha Lane) upon arrival and then with Adam (Forrest Goodluck).  This trio bonds over smoking pot in the woods and their collective desire to live their own lives with dignity, respect and freedom to make their own choices.  

This concept of gay conversion therapy is so infuriating, this prison camp brainwashes teenagers into thinking that they are these horrible diseased people who are no different from drug addicts who need rehab.  All of this under the guise of religious “love and understanding”.  Cameron and the others are told they are gender confused and suffer from SSA or Same Sex Attraction.  Their treatment revolves around the metaphor of an iceberg and they must find out what lies under the surface that has made them this way.  Basically, if you're a girl who loves sports you're an obvious lesbian and boys who spend too much time with their mothers will turn up gay.  The tragic consequences of these teachings are emphasized by Mark, Adam’s roommate after he is denied a chance to come home by his father he has reached rock bottom.  Rejected by his family and constantly told he is unworthy, he attempts suicide by genital mutilation.  When Cameron is asked by an investigator about what goes on in the camp and if people are being abused, she sums up everything in one sentence. “How is programming people to hate themselves not emotional abuse”.  After these events, Cameron, Jane, and Mark decide enough is enough and plan their escape.  Reverend Rick is in a state of shock and denial and basically allows them to leave on a hike deep down knowing they’re probably not coming back.  They hitch a ride in the back of a pickup truck and for the first time feel the freedom to be their authentic selves without shame and embarrassment.


"Donnie Darko" The Modern Cult Film Phenomenon!


 4/21/2019

“Donnie Darko” is writer/director Richard Kelly’s debut film and is a modern day cult phenomenon.  This mysterious puzzle of a film has an otherworldly graphic novel feel to it.  It’s a mind-bending trip into the surreal as seen through the eyes of high school student Donnie Darko played by Jake Gyllenhaal.

The film was unfortunately released during a very troubling time in America, about a month after the events of September 11, 2001.  With its dark themes and a disturbing plan crash at its heart, the film never took off (so to speak).  Cast off as a disaster and a flop the film found its audience when it came to video.  Now it’s considered one of the great cult classic films of the new generation.  Some films just strike the right chord and have this magical quality to them that keeps you entranced even after several viewings.  While books and essays have been written on this film, I will keep this review relatively short and not go into detail as to what every single scene supposedly symbolizes.  Simply put “Donnie Darko” is a teenage love story involving time travel (and a six-foot bunny named Frank).

Donnie is a quiet young man who has “emotional problems” he sees a therapist and even though we see him act up at school there is this sensitivity to him.  The question of whether he is on a path to becoming a dangerous man is still up in the air.  He seems likable and very true to life.  The mystery begins with the films first scenes.  Donnie wakes up on a mountainside road next to his bike, seemingly unsure of how he got there.  As he rides home he sees that a jet engine has fallen from the sky and has destroyed his bedroom, although no planes have been reported damaged.  Donnie has an older sister, Elizabeth (played by real-life sister Maggie Gyllenhaal) who came home from a party just as the engine crashed into the house.  She’s alright but this scene is revisited near the end of the film.

Donnie is woken up in the middle of the night by visions of a man in a bunny suit, we find out that his name is Frank.  Frank tells him that the world is going to end at a certain time in about a month.  Frank seems to be controlling him and has him commit a series of crimes.  Donnie floods the school by taking an ax to the water main.  The next day he meets Gretchen, played by Jena Malone and they develop this great relationship over the course of the film until things come to a head at the end.  There are so many great characters in this film and all of the performances are spot on.  From Patrick Swayze’s cheesy but true to life self help guru Jim Cunningham to Drew Barrymore’s small role as English teacher.  Barrymore was a huge supporter of the film and a producer that helped it get made.  Each and every character has their own place and function in the world of Donnie Darko.  It seems that every question that is answered just leads to more questions.  This mythology of time travel is developed and a book called “The Philosophy of Time Travel” helps guide Donnie.  We eventually find out more about Frank and what is happening to Donnie but there always seems to be this missing piece of the puzzle that remains a mystery. 

A few years after its release on DVD, a director’s cut version was released with an extra 20 minutes or so added.  The commentary tracks do provide some answers but ultimately the film still holds up.  Richard Kelly also mentions that he pays great attention to the music he uses in his films and this could be part of the allure of the film.  When the song “Mad World” is playing over the climax of the film it just feels like the perfect song at the perfect time.  I love this film but for Kelly, it seems to be a double edge sword.  Since its release in 2001, he has directed two films, the bloated and incomprehensible “Southland Tales” and the decently mediocre adaptation of a Richard Matheson short story “The Box”.  That is it.  His is still a fairly young guy so maybe he’ll make a comeback of some sorts, but we’ll always have “Donnie Darko”. 


"Misery" is a Horror Masterpiece

3/17/2019

The novels of Stephen King have been made into several movies and TV shows with varying degrees of success and quality.  “Misery” is one of the good ones second only to “The Shawshank Redemption.”  “Misery” gathered together the best talent in all aspects and created a modern horror masterpiece.  

Kathy Bates’s role of Annie Wilkes won her the Best Actress Academy Award for 1991.  Her portrayal of an unhinged and delusional super fan of romance novelist Paul Sheldon was simply amazing and terrifying.  James Caan, who is usually cast as the tough guy, plays a sensitive writer who upon finishing his new novel crashes his car in the snowy Colorado Mountains.  This setting made me think of the “The Shining” another King masterpiece.  When Paul comes too, we hear Annie’s words echo “I’m your number one fan”.  Paul’s injuries leave him bedridden, but Annie, a former nurse, takes care of him.  She seems sweet and innocent wearing a gold cross around her neck, but her behavior gets increasingly erratic.  Upon reading Paul’s new manuscript and the fact that he has killed off Misery, the female heroine of his romance novels, Annie goes a little berserk.  She has Paul burn the pages and re-write “a better story”.  Paul needs to build up his strength and formulate a plan to get out.  He has Annie go to the store to get a certain kind of paper which allows him and his wheelchair to get out of his room and explore the house.  Although when she finds out this leads to one of the best and most cringe-inducing scenes of the film.  Annie Wilkes is one of the great female horror icons for which there are very few.  She is right up there with Mrs. Vorhees from “Friday the 13th”.  She is a very human and complex character who is extremely disturbed.  

Buster the local sheriff is an old-timer played by Richard Farnsworth.  He and his clerk/wife Virginia pretty much make up the police force of the small sleepy town.  They have some really nice scenes together, but when he goes to investigate the Wilkes house he is in for a few surprises.  It’s up to Paul to save himself and when Annie has reached the end of her rope its do or die.

The movie is about these two characters and the cat and mouse game they play.  Both actors turn in brilliant performances.  The script was written by the legendary William Goldman and directed by Rob Reiner.


"The Eyes of My Mother" is a Must See!

3/2/2019

The art house horror film has really flourished in the last few years with several filmmakers making really great films that hope to breathe new life into the often tired and overworked horror genre.  “The Eyes of My Mother” is the debut film from Nicholas Pesce and is a searing look into one woman's grief and loneliness.  The film is presented in black and white not as a cheap gimmick, but as the best way to tell this quiet, stark and stripped down story of its characters.

Set in a country farmhouse in about the 1950s or 60s a young girl named Francisca is fascinated by a butchered cows head, her mother an eye surgeon indulges in her daughter's curiosity.  Later while playing outside a drifter comes by the house and starts up a conversation with little Francisca.  The man looks to be in his twenties and is dressed like a bible salesman, but as they say, he don't look right.  Francisca’s mother comes out right away, the man then asks to use the bathroom and she reluctantly agrees.  The man is outright creepy and as one might think he is a psychotic killer, who drags the mother into the bathroom at gunpoint.  When Francisca’s father comes home, he finds the man in the bathroom with his dead wife.  Although Francisca is still alive she is deeply traumatized.  Instead of calling the police, they hand out their own form of justice and keep the man, who they call Charlie, chained up in the barn.  Flash forward about 10 years and Charlie has become this blinded feral beast and Francisca’s pet and only friend.  Her father is a very quiet and reserved man and when he finally dies it is the last straw in Francisca’s desperate life.

In some ways, this movie is a female version of Alfred Hitchcock’s “Psycho”.  Unable to deal with her father’s death she keeps his body and bathes it and sleeps with it.  She does make an effort to reach out to others as she goes to a bar one night and brings a woman back to her house but in short, time creeps the hell out of her.  As the woman tries to leave Francisca smacks he over the head.  We then see her putting little wrapped packages into the refrigerator.  This film can be subtle in its depiction of its nastiness, but also very overt when it wants to be.  Francisca is a very complex character with tremendous internal struggle.  Her fear of loneliness and abandonment has been eating away at her for years with no way to express herself.  In another attempt at intimacy, she unchains Charlie, bathes him and has sex with him.  She wakes up and finds him gone, she finds him staggering along in the fields outside the house.  She catches up with him and kills him.


Now is where the story gets even more disturbing.  She needs a new pet, so she hitches a ride from a young mother with a baby.  When they get to the farmhouse she asks to hold the baby and takes off with it.  The mother runs after her and into the house, where Francisca sets a trap and knocks her out.  She then blinds her and chains her up in the barn.  We flash forward again and the baby, Antonio, is now about five.  His is curious about what is in the barn and despite Francisca’s warning about going in there, he must investigate.  Although he is frightened, he shows love and compassion for this dirty long haired creature who is his real mother.  One night he leaves the barn door open and she escapes.  This is the downfall of Francisca and the end to her painful and tortured life that started at the hands of a mad man.  Although this is a very short film, about 75 minutes, it doesn’t waste a second in telling its sad and disturbing tale.  


"Piercing" Gets Right to the Point

2/22/2019
*This review does contain Spoilers*

This short little film, barely running 80 minutes, is the second film from director Nicolas Pesce whose debut film “The Eyes of My Mother” was a dark and disturbing art house horror film that won rave reviews.  “Piercing” is based on a book by Ryu Murakami, who also wrote “Audition” which was made into the celebrated cult classic film of the same name.  Both novels and films lie in a sort of taboo world of sex and violence.  Pesce also adapted the novel for the big screen and although I have not personally read the novel, his film has this sort of retro stylization aesthetic that reminds me of a young Tarantino.  Although it seems like most young filmmakers go through a phase like this, Pesce’s use of this style creates a unique world that these characters live in.

As we pan through a vast forest of high rise apartment buildings of what looks to be Tokyo or some other megacity we are introduced to Reed, played by Christopher Abbott, a young husband and father who we notice is a little unbalanced as he holds on ice pick above his infant son, only to be startled by his wife, who is none the wiser.  Reed is going off on a “business” trip in which he plans on killing a prostitute with the aforementioned ice pick.  He is quite delusional in that his baby speaks a line in a demonic tone, “You know what you have to do”.  It’s hard to decipher the time period that the story takes place in.  It looks like to be an ultra-modern future but with old technology.  There are no cell phones or computers and the use of touch-tone phones and phone booths are widely used.

Reed checks into his room and goes through the motions of how he is going to kill and dismember his victim.  He even tests out the bottle of Chloroform that he brought.   He is very cautious about touching things which could be to eliminate fingerprints or as it turns out he is a bit of a germaphobe.  He gets a call from the escort service that his girl will be there within in the hour.   We then meet Jackie, played by Mia Wasikowska, who lives alone in another modern looking apartment, she gets a call from her pimp to packs up her things to meet with Reed.  As we come to find out Jackie and Reed are not all that different and his carefully thought out plan goes to pieces almost from the start.  Jackie looks to be the one in control right from the start and you start to wonder exactly who is playing who.  These are tortured characters who look fine on the outside, but start peeling away the layers are you find something dark and deeply disturbed.  This is the start of an intense S&M relationship that sees Reed drugged and beaten (by a can opener) and Jackie abusing herself all in the service of some greater need to feel.  In one of the films final scenes Jackie pierces her nipple “as a way to remember this”.  The last scene is of a ball gaged Reed finally giving into Jackie and a sort of communal relationship and understanding is formed.


The Best Horror Film in the last 10 Years! "Hereditary"

2/7/2019

*Spoiler Warning*  Key plot points and events will be mentioned

“Hereditary” is one of the most intensely frightening and all-consuming stories of terror to come out in the past decade.  It was at the top my list of best films for 2018 and it's a damn shame that Toni Collette did not get a best actress academy award nomination.  Although she is nominated for another award that actually still matters, The Independent Spirit Award for Best Actress.  This is also the feature film debut for writer/director by Ari Aster.  So excited for this guys future and for the films yet to come.

“Hereditary” opens up with an obituary for Ellen Taper Leigh, which immediately sets an ominous tone.  We then venture through an art studio with doll houses and into a room that seamlessly morphs into a real room.  We have here your average American family Mom, Dad, teenaged son and younger daughter.  They are going to the funeral of their grandmother from their mother's side.  Annie, played by Toni Collette, is an artist who constructs lifelike miniature dioramas of things that have happened in her life, very similar to real life artist Laurie Simmons.  Her husband is some sort of doctor and least used character of the film.  The kids Peter and Charlie are seemingly normal although Charlie is a bit strange and something is definitely going on with her.  Peter looks to be a regular dude who hangs out and smokes pot with his friends, he also has a strained relationship with his mother.  Annie was also estranged from her mother as well and mentions their troubled relationship in her eulogy.  Annie reluctantly shows up at grief counseling group were she mentions her families history of mental illness and her brother's suicide.  This is only the beginning of Annie’s grief.

Peter wants to go to a party but in order to use the car he must take Charlie with him and he agrees.  Charlie keeps to herself and doesn’t seem to every fit in anywhere.  She dresses in an oversized red hoody and likes sweets.  It is also mentioned earlier that she is allergic to peanuts, this comes back to haunt as the chocolate cake she eats has nuts in it.  Her throat starts to close up and panic ensues,  she finds Peter and they race off the hospital.  In a panic, Charlie sticks her head out the windows as Peter swerves to avoid a dead animal in the road.  Charlie is decapitated by a telephone pole.  This film means business and the WTF meter goes off the charts for most of the film.  In a state of catatonic shock, Peter just drives home and goes to bed.  The next morning Annie finds her daughter's headless body in her car and totally loses her shit, which is completely earned.  There are seemingly no cheap or unearned scares or emotions, everything comes along organically and makes it that more frightening.  The film keeps reaching new levels of grief and emotional intensity.

 While in the parking lot of another group counseling meeting, she is flagged down by a woman named Joan who wants to help Annie cope.  Although not immediately Joan becomes this strange and sinister character and we find out that their meeting was anything but coincidental.  We see that Annie’s mother had an interest in the occult when she goes through her boxed up things.  It can be shocking and frightening to find out things about a family member or loved one who you thought you knew but has this hidden secret life.  We keep seeing this particular design or logo everywhere, from necklaces to graffiti and all over her mother's things.  Its meaning becomes clear in the end.

Joan introduced a supernatural phenomenon to Anne and proves that she can connect with Charlie just like she connected with her own deceased loved one.  It works but then Annie also seems to be on the brink of a full mental collapse.  She shows this to her increasingly skeptical family and they just think she has lost it and needs help.  But is she really on to something.  This film is all about the horrors of family dynamics.  Relationships between people who you are bound to by blood whether you like it or not.  This is a very extreme scenario that eventually ventures off into the supernatural, but it strangely all feels completely natural and plausible.    

This film requires multiple viewings to fully process everything, seemingly random shots and stills have a much larger meaning within the whole context of the film.  The film as a whole has this intensely heavy atmosphere throughout.  The score and clever use of sound is not something you usually comment on but here it was done masterfully.  I’ve seen this movie a number of times and still love every minute of it.  It still holds that strong emotional pull to it as well.  I don’t buy man blu-rays anymore but this one is going into the collection for sure.


Stephen King's "Graveyard Shift" is Quite the Chore

1/30/2019

Stephen King’s “Graveyard Shift” in another scary story involving demonic animals, this time it’s rats.  Released in the fall of 1990 and years after the golden era of horror films that was the 1980s.  “Graveyard Shift” is shall we say one of King’s least admired adaptations.  I have not read the short story on which the movie is based, but I’m sure something was probably lost in translation.

As per usual the story takes place in a small New England Town.  This time an old textile mill that is overrun with rats is the focus of the horrific events to come.  The rats seem to work as a team and controlled by a large mutant mother rat that for some reason has large bat wings.  The story is filled with colorful over the top characters starting with the Exterminator played by Brad Dourif,  he is a Vietnam vet and is very into his job.  He reminds me of Dale Gribble from the show “King of the Hill”.  Our hero is a drifter that blows into town looking for work and the mill is looking for people to clear out their basement.  John Hall is his name an he looks and acts just as bland as his name suggests, but does have a certain quiet dignity about him.  

The Bachman Mill as it is called is in reference to Stephen King’s writing pseudonym Richard Bachman, for which he wrote the story under.  The Mill’s foreman, Warwick, is another crazy shady character who is your typical tyrannical businessman.  The movies flow or lack thereof becomes an issue, it feels like it was edited by about six different people.  The acting is, of course, way over the top and comical at times, we never really get to know any of the characters in any important or interesting way.  What I did like though was the set design and the wet dreary atmosphere of the dilapidated mill.  The pieces are there for a good movie but the execution just misses the mark completely.  


Our group of mill workers make their way through a series of tunnels in the bowels of the old mill each of them eventually being picked off one by one by the mutant rat-bat.  We end up with John finding the creature’s lair, a giant boneyard of skeletons and leftovers.  He then leads is up to the giant industrial cotton grinder and the rest writes itself.  If you're in the mood for some stupid mindless horror with the Stephen King name then this is the movie for you.  The early to mid-90s was a dark time for scary movies as the idea tank was bled dry.  Although that being said 1990 was also the year that the two-part miniseries“It” hit T.V. screens.


"Firestarter" is a Smoldering Mess

1/24/2019

In May of 1984, just a few months after Stephen King’s “Children of the Corn” was released, “Firestarter” came to theaters.  Starring the young Drew Barrymore who was just coming off her big break in “E.T.”  “Firestarter” did not perform terribly well at the box office just barely making its money back, but it the years since it has more than made enough.

David Keith plays Andy McGee you average dude who looks a lot like Patrick Swayze.  In his college days, Andy and 9 others take part in an experimental drug trial run by a secret government agency called The Shop.  There he meets his future wife Vicky, played by Heather Locklear.  The drug called “Lot 6” is administered to some while others just get a placebo.  Andy and Vickie discover they can talk to each other through telepathy, while the other subjects have more violent reactions.

Years later Andy and Vicky have an eight-year-old girl named Charlene or Charlie (Barrymore), who also has special powers.  She can start fires when she gets angry.  Andy and Vicky have been constantly on the run from The Shop agents who want to terminate the two remaining subjects of the failed experiment.  They do however desperately want Charlie before she can fully develop and control her powers, which could literally destroy the world.  The Shop is led by Martin Sheen’s character Captain Hollister and his right-hand man John Rainbird played by George C. Scott.  John gets to Vicky and is killed while Andy and Charlie are eventually captured.  They are both put through a series of tests and John goes undercover to gain Charlie’s affections.  He ends up coming off a creepy pedophile uncle.  This film has numerous flaws and just utter craziness that makes it my opinion a complete misfire.

“Firestarter” felt a lot a really bad version of “Carrie”.  A young girl with telepathic powers that will be fully realized at puberty and ends in a fiery armageddon.  The acting is completely over the top and ridiculous especially from Sheen and Scott.  While attempting to capture Charlie a team of silver-suited spacemen from the 1950s runs after her.  I get it they are supposed to be fire suits but it just looks super cheesy and low rent.  Although the fire and effects were good for the time, I’m sure they could make an effective remake of the film.  Drew Barrymore is quite the little actress and outdoes all of her older counterparts.

With all of Stephen King films released in the 1980s, “Firestarter” in my mind was a miss.  They can’t all be classics, but for some people, they do have a nostalgic love for the film.  A year later in 1985 Drew has another part in the Stephen King anthology film “Cat’s Eye”.  If you looking for “Firestarter” it does have a special edition Blu-ray release from Shout Factory.


Take a Ride with "Christine"


1/15/2019

Stephen King has brought us stories of possessed Dogs, Cats, and werewolves, now we move on to inanimate objects like the bright red 1957 Plymouth Fury in “Christine”.  Can a car have a mind of its own? Most definitely, but can it kill people, well that would make for a good story.  Directed by the master of horror himself John Carpenter, who just 5 years earlier debuted “Halloween” that changed horror movies forever.

Arnie Cunningham, played by Keith Gordon, is the epitome of the nerdy high school student, even his hame screams dorkiness.  Although he is best friends with Dennis the quarterback of the football team.  Arnie then has a serious run-in with the school's motorhead bullies with their leader the ironically name Buddy.  Buddy, who looks about 30 years old, whips out a switchblade and terrorizes Arnie only to be saved by Dennis.  Dennis drives a hot muscle car and Arnie wants to get one for himself.  He finds a rusted out and beat to hell ’57 Plymouth Fury in an old man's junkyard and has an instant connection with it.  The 20-year-old car has a history, in the movies opening scene we see the car rolling off the assembly line and taking its first victim.  Arnie’s parents are not too keen on him having the car and forbid him from keeping it at the house, so he brings it to a big garage where he can restore it.  He strikes a deal with the gruff and greasy shop owner and Arnie gets to work.  

Although the premise of “Christine” sounds a little ridiculous and in the wrong hands could be really bad, Carpenter and writer Bill Phillips turn Kings novel into a decent movie.  The idea that people, especially men, can get obsessively attached to their cars to the point that it changes their attitude and behavior is quite believable.  Arnie eventually restores the car to like new condition.  Arnie also starts to change, he does away with his glasses and adopts an edgier and rebellious personality.  He also starts going out with the prettiest girl in school, Leigh, played by Alexandra Paul.  Noticing Arnie’s transformation and new reputation with his hot new car, Buddy and the guys absolutely trash Christine an even take a crap on the dash (nice touch!).  Furious and defeated, Arnie looks to get revenge and nobody wants it more than Christine, who in a bit of cool 80s special effects fixes and restores herself.  Arnie is completely under Christine’s spell and nothing else in his life matters.  The bullies start showing up dead and detective Rudolf Junkins, played by Harry Dean Stanton, start poking into Arnie’s business.  When they see their friend going off the deep and acting all crazy Dennis and Leigh try to help Arnie, but is too far gone?  Has Christine claimed yet another victim?

“Christine” is an interesting movie in that it's not really a horror movie, it’s not gory or all that suspenseful, but it has strong characters and is a well-written teen thriller.  They wanted the movie to be rated “R” so they actually had to add in a lot more swearing and dirty language to achieve it.  It’s a movie that a lot of people who grew up in the 1980s can remember seeing and like a lot of other Stephen King movie holds a special place in peoples lives.